Punishment for penalty too often exceeds crime
By Neil Rudel nrudel@altoonamirror.com The answer to today’s point-counterpoint question, like the old “Scruples” game, is a definite “depends.” First off, player safety must be paramount so the concept of discouraging targeting is admirable. The days of players staggering back to the huddle with concussions – players were denied water in the same era, through the 1960s-70s, and given salt tablets instead — are thankfully gone. While the targeting rule, in theory, is positive, its administration is not. Players called for targeting are ejected and also forced to ...