Liberals shouldn’t fear election scrutiny

I can’t be silent with this one.

It has been said that if a lie is told often, forcefully and loudly enough, eventually that “lie” will be considered the truth.

The letter on July 16 is

certainly proof of that.

Where is the evidence of Russia’s interference with the election that helped Donald Trump win the White House in 2016? I beg to differ.

It has been proven over and over again that Russia did not interfere, and there was no help to get Trump in the White House. It’s interesting that Trump is not the president, but his opponents can’t seem to get him off their minds.

It’s also interesting that while conservatives may insist improprieties with the 2020 election, liberals make the same claim about the 2016 election. Liberals insist that the election of 2016 was stolen.

What’s wrong with ensuring that elections are fair?

This is not about attempting to get Trump back into office; it’s about the future of the election process in the United States.

Where is the evidence that there was no election fraud?

President Biden is in the office of president because electoral vote certification put him there. This is the constitution at work. If someone did have the authority to “call a halt to these Trump fanatics who refuse to accept the truth,” then we are truly living under a totalitarian government.

The fact that State Senator Doug Mastriano is looking into the election is because he took an oath to the constitution. Trump had nothing to do with it.

Where is the evidence that Republican lawmakers are creating more voter suppression?

Aren’t we all interested that elections are fair and above reproach?

What are the liberals afraid of?

Is there fear that something hidden will be brought to light?

David Greenwood



Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)
Are you a paying subscriber to the newspaper? *


Starting at $4.39/week.

Subscribe Today