Lawyers: Prove Pa. ballots are legal

The election case playing out in U.S. Middle District Court added another chapter Friday in the legal battle between President Donald J. Trump’s lawyers and those for state Secretary of State Kathy Boockvar.

Trump and his counsel, led by Rudolph Giuliani, the president’s lawyer, and Marc Scaringi, a Harrisburg-based attorney, each signed onto a brief filed Friday that asked U.S. Middle District Judge Matthew W. Brann to rule against the state’s request for dismissal.

Giuliani and Scaringi have claimed the defense counsel must prove the state mail ballots are valid.

“If mail ballots are to be counted, the burden of proof shifts to defense to prove the ballots are valid,” the president’s attorneys said.

Their argument is that if, on the eve of election, changes to state law governing a presidential election were improper, and if such votes are to be counted, at a minimum, the burden of proof shifts to the defendants to prove the mail ballots are valid.

The two Trump lawyers ripped apart the state system, which Giuliani and Scaringi called “so porous” and lacking in checks and balances that it constitutes a case that the election process itself reaches the point of patent and fundamental unfairness.

The alleged violation has brought about a due process clause challenge, the attorneys said.

In response, the defense attorneys said the mail-in ballots, which were valid unless they were found defective and cured, were postmarked by Election Day and are valid and permitted to be counted after Election Day, due to a ruling by the state Supreme Court.


Today's breaking news and more in your inbox

I'm interested in (please check all that apply)


Starting at $4.39/week.

Subscribe Today