PHILADELPHIA - The final debate Monday night among the four Democrats seeking the party's nomination to take on Republican Gov. Tom Corbett in the fall veered between responses to policy questions, and efforts to bend answers into attacks on the front-running first-time candidate Tom Wolf.
The debate at Drexel University in Philadelphia was the candidates' last in a long string of well over a dozen, coming eight days before Pennsylvania's May 20 primary election. It also was in front of their biggest TV audience yet - Drexel said 22 radio and TV stations carried it live - and perhaps was a last, best chance to sway the party faithful.
As if to underscore the nastiness of the past month, the candidates were asked at the end of the debate by moderator Larry Kane - on behalf of U.S. Rep. Bob Brady - if they would attend a unity breakfast after the primary election. They each said they would.
The candidates responsible for much of the attacks on Wolf, state Treasurer Rob McCord and Congresswoman Allyson Schwartz, were also asked to justify their attacks by the questioners, who included journalists.
McCord and Schwartz defended themselves by saying they were simply trying to ensure that the Democratic Party emerged from the primary with the best candidate to take on Corbett. And they repeatedly questioned whether Wolf, who has led a family owned business for most of the last three decades and used his personal wealth to outspend the other candidates, is experienced enough to get Democratic Party priorities through a Republican-controlled Legislature.
"There's just no evidence at all that being unvetted, untested in the primary is a good idea," McCord said, before he compared Wolf to Corbett. "We're making sure we don't have another untested Tom."
Wolf countered that his record speaks for itself, including his work to improve York, where his company, the Wolf Organization, is headquartered, and he cast himself as the best candidate prepared to harness Pennsylvania's private sector and use it to improve the economy.
Wolf, who holds a doctorate in political science from MIT and served briefly as secretary of revenue under former Gov. Ed Rendell, also scoffed at the notion that he is unqualified to be governor.