
Environmentalists, DEP raise issues with wind farm
By Greg Bock, gbock@altoonamirror.comPORT MATILDA - Iron pyrite was among the risks to water quality that opponents of the Sandy Ridge Wind Farm pointed to during Monday's state Department of Environmental Protection public hearing.
"Given the formations, there is a likelihood there's some up there," Michael J. Byle, a civil engineer who is working with Gamesa USA, said after the public meeting and hearing on the proposed wind farm.
Core drilling has just begun, and the company is looking for the acid rock that wreaked havoc on the Interstate 99 project at Skytop but Byle declined to say what has been found.
Bill Fink, mayor-elect of Tyrone Borough, which has leased its municipal watershed in Snyder Township so Gamesa can place 16 turbines there, pressed Gamesa officials to say whether or not they've definitely found pyrite after it was brought up by Save Our Allegheny Ridge representative Laura Jackson.
Gamesa officials said it was too early to report any findings.
David Gurg, program manager for the DEP's Watershed Management Program, said the possibility of pyrite was one of the deficiencies his agency identified in Gamesa's application. The DEP has asked for data on the pyrite and indicated that if it's found, Gamesa would have to change its designs or move roads or turbines to avoid it.
While the DEP doesn't regulate wind farms, it will decide whether Gamesa gets its National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit.
The federally-mandated permit ensures that any earth moved because of the project, including the building of roads and turbine pads, is done with minimal impact on water quality.
Gamesa's planned one-lane access road near Big Fill Run is another problem the DEP has with the project, officials said.
Ed Shoener, the consultant who prepared the application on behalf of Gamesa, said the company has gone "above and beyond" what is required by the state to protect Big Fill Run, a designated "exceptional value" trout stream that feeds the Little Juniata River. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers inspected the project's sites and determined they won't impact streams or wet lands.
Others on hand for the public hearing Monday at the Bald Eagle Lodge No. 51, Fraternal Order of Police, disagreed.
Representatives from the local Audubon and Sierra Club chapters, along with Little Juniata River Association, joined concerned residents in questioning the wind farm's impact on Big Fill Run and the forests of Ice and Gardner mountains.
Opponents of the project deviated from the hearing's focus on water issues to say that much of the proposed 25-turbine wind farm is in an area of exceptional conservation value and asked why not put the 400-foot-high turbines on tracts of former strip mines to the west.
Little Juniata River Association spokesman Gary Miller said the river is finally making a comeback after decades of pollution and that Big Fill Run is an integral tributary.
"The permit application has issues that raise questions," Miller said.
Not everyone at the hearing was against the project.
Debbie and Mike Flanagan of Hollidaysburg arrived with a petition of more than 200 names in support of the project.
"They're prettier than cell towers and they're nicer than cooling towers," said Mike Flanagan, who has worked to erect about 140 turbines.
"These people obviously couldn't be here but they're showing their support," Debbie Flanagan said.
DEP officials said they will take Monday's testimony regarding water issues into consideration during its review process and will continue to accept written testimony at the department's Northcentral Office in Williamsport until Nov. 30.
Mirror Staff Writer Greg Bock is at 946-7458.
|
97neon
|
|
|---|---|
|
11-25-09 7:16 AM
|
Pittdan7; I agree with you that wind farms are a joke. You'd need 6,000 industrial-scale wind turbines to equal the output of ONE nuclear plant. PA has 5 nuclear plants that provide 40% of our electricity. France, which is WAY ahead of us in nuclear development, gets 80% of its electricity from nuclear, and recycles its nuclear waste. Regarding your comments about landowners posting the banks of streams, I don't see any connection. Antidegradation laws apply to all waters, posted or not.
|
|
pittdan7
|
|
|
11-24-09 11:42 PM
|
97neon: Your agenda is sweet but the truth is, nobody in the real world buys the act. We all see the "movement" for what it is. Wind farms are a joke. Your argument doesn't hold water for your exceptional waterways. If it was a mud pond, it still needs to be protected but you throw these words around like they mean something. Truth is, it's all posted downstream now so that a guy who can order waders out of an LL Bean catalog can go fishing. We keep hearing all of these high minded ideals and for what? So the enviro guys that are making a buck on it can get torn down by the enviro guys that can't. Save it for earth day. Truth is, most of us could care less so long as nobody makes a mess of things, nobody gets sick and we don't have to pay to clean it up.
|
|
97neon
|
|
|
11-24-09 3:13 PM
|
pittdan7; Exceptional Value is an official DEP designation indicating that a stream or watershed is unimpaired. The proposed windplant site is also described as being "of exceptional conservation value" in the Blair County Natural Heritage Inventory, a document available from the Blair County Planning Commission.
|
|
RidgeRunner
|
|
|
11-24-09 3:03 PM
|
Big Fill is an exceptional value trout stream. Suitable sites can be found elsewhere which wouldn't involve such adverse impacts.
|
|
pittdan7
|
|
|
11-24-09 2:07 PM
|
When I hear things like "exceptional value" and "suitable sites" or "adverse impacts" I shut down.
|
|
pittdan7
|
|
|
11-24-09 2:04 PM
|
So much for sarcasm.
|
|
97neon
|
|
|
11-24-09 1:51 PM
|
sickntired; I agree with you. If you want to see Gamesa press releases printed verbatim as "news", then check out the Tyrone Daily Herald. Daily Herald reporter Kris Yaniello regularly earned his pay by doing "cut and paste" jobs with Gamesa's press releases and having them printed in the Tyrone Daily Herald with his byline.
|
|
sickntired
|
|
|
11-24-09 1:20 PM
|
I would like to thank Greg Bock for writing an objective, fact-based article. So refreshing not to see the usual wind company spin lines laced throughout an article regarding wind power.
|
|
nospinhere
|
|
|
11-24-09 12:59 PM
|
I stand corrected. I had read an article in regards to the leak last weekend and thought that I had read they were not renewing.
|
|
97neon
|
|
|
11-24-09 10:35 AM
|
nospinhere; You are incorrect: Londonderry Twp., P.a. (Oct. 22, 2009) – The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) today notified Exelon Nuclear that it has approved Three Mile Island Unit 1’s request for a 20-year extension to its original operating license. “License renewal for Three Mile Island means that the plant will continue to provide safe, clean and reliable energy to south central Pennsylvania through 2034,” said William Noll, TMI site vice president. “Three Mile Island employees are committed to continuing to operate the plant at world class levels of performance.” Exelon scientists and experts have worked for two years to demonstrate that Three Mile Island Unit 1 can continue to safely generate 852 megawatts of electricity each year – enough for 800,000 typical homes. Each hour that Three Mile Island operates, it avoids 271 metric tons of carbon dioxide that would be emitted by a replacement coal-fired plant similar in size to TMI Unit 1.
|
|
nospinhere
|
|
|
11-24-09 10:21 AM
|
Three Mile Island will be closing when the lease runs out on reactor #2 which is in the near future. Reactor #1 has been down since the 70's.
|
|
97neon
|
|
|
11-24-09 10:20 AM
|
pittdan7; An industrial windplant is like any other development. Some locations are suitable, some not. This location is not appropriate because it is a Blair County Natural Heritage Area and contains the only Exceptional Value stream in the Little Juniata Watershed. There are plenty of suitable sites on strip mines just to the west of the proposed area. The windplant should be built there. You can support "clean energy" without having to put wind turbines or solar panels everywhere, without regard to their adverse impacts.
|
|
97neon
|
|
|
11-24-09 10:16 AM
|
RazMnaz; Gamesa, a multi-billion dollar international corporation with billions of dollars of federal and state subsidies backing it up, is not the underdog.
|
|
97neon
|
|
|
11-24-09 10:14 AM
|
donkeysrule; You would need 6,000 industrial-scale wind turbines to equal the electricity produced by ONE nuclear plant. PA has 5 nuclear plants that provide 40% of PA's electricity and also supply neighboring states.
|
|
pittdan7
|
|
|
11-24-09 9:33 AM
|
Somebody help me out here. Are we supposed to be for clean energy or not? Should we protect the Little Juniata despite the fact it is now posted most of the way down by Donnie Beaver? Will the indiana bats get their day in court? Does acid rock mean a big concert in central pa or not? What the heck does the environmental lobby want me to believe? It's so darn confusing!
|
|
RazMnaz
|
|
|
11-24-09 9:21 AM
|
I know that making money is the magic key here, but I'll bet that Gamesa is really sick and tired of running into all these crybaby opposition groups, tree-huggers, and all the court proceedings and red tape that goes into putting up their windmills. I can't understand why so many people are so against something that will benefit us all in the longrun.
|
|
nospinhere
|
|
|
11-24-09 8:16 AM
|
Watch out for the BATS!
|
|
donkeysrule
|
|
|
11-24-09 7:58 AM
|
Find something other than what if's to cause problems. The same green weenies are screaming for cleaner sources of energy. build the turbines or a coal fired plant, it has to be one or the other.
|
|
Chuxspringer
|
|
|
11-24-09 7:25 AM
|
You are the wind beneath my feet!
|


