Mobile Version: mobile.altoonamirror.com
 
RSS:
»BREAKING NEWS» Congressman: Murtha's intestine damaged in surgery
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Food Inspections  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Coupons  Mirror Moms  Things To Do


  • Scholastic Sports
  • Penn State
  • Sports Columns
  • Voice of the Fan
  • Multimedia
  • AP News & Sports
  • Running/Wellness Challenge
  • Circulation Info
  • Real Estate
  • Advertising Info
  • Customer Service
  • Contact Us
  • Online Extras
  • Affiliated Sites

Police pinpoint money scheme

Investigator explains missing deposits at sheriff’s department

By Kay Stephens, kstephens@altoonamirror.com
POSTED: November 18, 2009

HOLLIDAYSBURG - A police investigator testified Tuesday that he identified a common theft scheme in trying to track what happened to more than $6,000 in deposits at the Blair County Sheriff's Department.

"It's called lapping," state trooper Craig Grassmyer said.

The process involves taking a check or checks slated for one deposit and using them to make up for cash removed from another deposit, Grassmyer said.

Magisterial District Judge Paula Aigner ruled that District Attorney Richard Consiglio offered enough evidence to send theft and related charges against Diane Wilt, 51, of Roaring Spring to the Blair County Court.

Wilt, a secretary in the sheriff's department for 11 years, was arrested last week and charged with theft by unlawful taking, receiving stolen property and theft by failure to make disposition of funds. She routinely prepared bank deposit slips, listing cash and checks paid for gun permits and other services handled by the sheriff department.

Attorney Thomas M. Dickey told Aigner that Consiglio offered no evidence pointing to Wilt as the one responsible for the missing money.

"All their evidence points out that it was never her," Dickey said. "Her accounts were always reconciled." Consiglio referred to the lapping scheme as a way "to make it look like it was kosher."

He used testimony from Grassmyer and Blair County Finance Director Tim Brown to establish that between April and September 2008, three deposits with cash and checks, compiled by the sheriff's department, were never turned in to the bank. Instead, checks from those missing deposits were submitted with later deposits in place of cash, Consiglio said.

Dickey tried to convince Aigner that a sheriff's deputy, including ones who have since resigned, could have retained the missing deposits instead of taking them to a bank.

Consiglio shook his head no.

"[The deposit] is only taken by a deputy if a deputy gets it in the first place," Consiglio said.

Grassmyer said he considered Dickey's theory but discarded it after Wilt told him during questioning that she prepared the deposit slips. Grassmyer said he asked Wilt if she took the money, and she said no. He said Wilt hesitated when he asked if she were willing to pay the money back to get the state police investigation to go away, but she then said no because she didn't take the money.

Wilt remains out of jail on $100,000 unsecured bail. She is to have no contact with the sheriff's department.

Her status as a county employee is under discussion between the county and the United Mine Workers of America, the union that represents Wilt.

Mirror Staff Writer Kay Stephens is at 946-7456.

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-18 | Post a comment
CharlieVarrick
11-19-09 9:39 AM
Thanks Pete just wasn't sure how this worked.

epoch1
11-18-09 9:07 PM
sgn355: Her hesitation was likely included because it is one more thing that increases the chance she is guilty. It in and of itself is nothing. But when its added to the rest of the puzzle it helps make the case a hair stronger.

DRILLMAMMA: I am hoping you were at the preliminary hearing, because most people shouldn't expect to hear enough proof via a newspaper article. And even if you were at the preliminary hearing, its a prima facie case. So the Commonwealth would present as little evidence as possible; just enough to kick it up to the courthouse.

DRILLMAMMA
11-18-09 7:59 PM
Sgn--No one will remember her name 6 mo. from now. I would fight for my job and character if I knew I was being wrongfully charged with something I didn't do.

COP1736
11-18-09 7:29 PM
There is probably more going on here then we hear about. This issue doesn't make any sense to me. If going off the first article she owed over $80,000 why wouldn't she take more? Why all of a sudden after 11 years on the job would she now decide to take money and do a poor job of covering her tracks? I had read a news article last year in this very paper that stated that the Commissoner's hired an outside firm to turn over their books in 2008. The firm stated that there were no problems with the books in 2008, and now $6000 comes up missing? Something doesn't make sense here. Hopefully the real person can be caught and brought to justice.

sgn355
11-18-09 7:22 PM
Does no one see an issue with the police using her "hesitation" as a sign of guilt??? Even if 100% not guilty, I would probably hesitate too if asked if paying back the money would make the investigation go away. You're name would be out of the press, you wouldn't be dealing with legal fees, there would be no chance of being found guilty and being put in jail, etc. If someone was offering me an "out" from this legal nightmare I would seriously consider taking it just to make it all go away. maybe she's guilty but maybe she's not....anytime anyone hears her name now they'll associate it with her being a thief.

pete22
11-18-09 6:58 PM
IMO if I get my concealed carry permit, I don't care if the county gets their $30 or not. It wouldn't be worth my time to get a money order. It is their responsibility to safeguard the funds.

LovePaMountains
11-18-09 4:18 PM
I'm not saying what has happened is OK, but why would anyone hand over cash for any business done at a government office? If I didn't have a checking account, I'd at least get a money order for .79 at the grocery store.

pete22
11-18-09 2:49 PM
Drillmama - Say hypothetically someone else took the money. Why would the normal person making the deposits cover that money with checks from another deposit?

Charlie - bonded company wouldn't help because the cash never made it that far. Apparently, it hit someone's pocket soon after issuing the permit. Probably need to compare the daily deposits with a list of permits issued for that day.

DRILLMAMMA
11-18-09 10:26 AM
I'm not saying shes innocent. I'm just saying I'm not convinced shes totally guilty. She could have very well done this, but I would need more proof. There is alot of crooked stuff going on there. Personally, I think the money should be turned over to the Controllers Office, then let them deposit it. Some of the deputies are no better than the criminals they transport. Need I say more.

skyler
11-18-09 9:33 AM
Are you all forgetting what happenend in District Court with Ms. Dively, this is the same senairo, Ms Dively was the only one allowed to write checks, open the mail, make deposits slips and go to the bank. I remember not getting my check due me from this office because Ms. Dively would be out sicke or whatever the excuse and would have to wait for days to be paid -Because she was the only one allowed to "do the checks".) This girl Wilt sounds like she did the same thing only once in a while she would cover her tracks and have a deputy take the bags to the bank just in case she would get caught then there would be a trace of deception that could help her out. There is corruption in Blair County government offices but everyone is too blind to see it. And with Fields still at the helm NO WONDER>!

epoch1
11-18-09 9:18 AM
DRILLMAMMA: Maybe the 17% of deposits made by other persons do not total $6,000. Or maybe all those deposits were documented. Don't you think Trooper Grassmyer would have investigated the other persons making the deposits before charging her. Theses guys are good at what they do. That's one of the reasons he's an investigator and no longer working the streets.

DRILLMAMMA
11-18-09 9:08 AM
Pete--she only made 83% of the deposits. Who made the others?

CharlieVarrick
11-18-09 8:36 AM
I'm not to familiar with how this works but isn't there a safer way for a County office to take money paid for whatever and then deposited into a bank so all the responsibility doesn't fall onto one person where anything can and sometimes does happen? I'm just wondering. Why can't a bonded company like those in the armor cars that go around and pick up money at business locations do it? It seems putting trust in a human being to do it in this day and age is risky. Any suggestions? Finding a solution I think is better than wasting time pointing fingers. If she did it, then by all means convict her on the evidence. If not find a solution that would prevent this in the future. It's a waste of tax dollars in my opinion guilty or not.

theadvocate
11-18-09 8:25 AM
How short memories are? May I suggest some of you posting here go back and read your posts when the story first broke

pete22
11-18-09 7:23 AM
If she was in charge of the deposits and there were checks that were not deposited that later turned up in other deposits to cover missing cash then who else could have put them there? It isn't a matter of cash showing on the deposit but missing when it got to the bank. They won't convict her because people won't be samrt enough to understand the fraud. Unfortunately this happens all the time and is normally the person you least expect.

JohnParker
11-18-09 6:29 AM
This is Blair County. Evidence doesn't matter, only conviction numbers.

DRILLMAMMA
11-18-09 5:26 AM
Sounds very fishy. Somebody is trying to cover their tracks and this poor woman may be the scapegoat. They better have more than circumstancial evidence if others could of handled the checks. Not enough proof righ tnow. A smart jury would see that. They need more evidence. This might be 1 case Dickey can win.

Shadow
11-18-09 12:25 AM
So very sad for Ms.Wilt my heart goes out to her.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Food Inspections  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Coupons  Mirror Moms  Things To Do