Mobile Version: mobile.altoonamirror.com
 
RSS:
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Food Inspections  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Coupons  Mirror Moms  Things To Do


  • Scholastic Sports
  • Penn State
  • Sports Columns
  • Voice of the Fan
  • Multimedia
  • AP News & Sports
  • Running/Wellness Challenge
  • Circulation Info
  • Real Estate
  • Advertising Info
  • Customer Service
  • Contact Us
  • Online Extras
  • Affiliated Sites

Court dismisses biker’s Tour lawsuit

Decision could help get race on a roll again

By Phil Ray, pray@altoonamirror.com
POSTED: June 25, 2009

HOLLIDAYSBURG - A court decision issued Wednesday by Blair County Judge Tim Sullivan may help the Tour de 'Toona get up and moving once again. But for the young female athlete paralyzed because of an accident in the 2005 race, it represents the beginning of yet another court struggle.

Sarah Scott, 31, was a planner who took bicycle racing seriously enough to train hard and to enter many races, but her quest to move up in her sport came to an end July 29, 2005, as she was traveling with a pack of racers along a 19.5-mile loop around Martinsburg Borough.

Going around a corner at Sportsman Road onto Route 866, she moved to the outside of the pack and went off the paved portion of the highway.

Her bike landed in a 3-foot-deep ditch, fracturing her back and paralyzing her from the sternum down.

She sued the Tour de 'Toona, the Altoona Bicycle Club and its president, Larry Bilotto, the US Cycling Federation, PennDOT and Huston Township.

Sullivan dismissed her lawsuit Wednesday, emphasizing in his 30-page opinion that Scott had signed two releases prior to the race assuming the risks and agreeing not to sue in the event of injury.

Her attorney, Marcy L. Colkitt of Indiana, had argued before Sullivan six weeks ago that the agreement not to sue did not absolve the organizers of the bicycle race of "reckless conduct," noting that they knew of the dangerous ditch but did nothing to protect the cyclists, such as placing hay bales in front of it.

The judge responded by ruling there was "nothing ambiguous" about the language included in the releases.

They "clearly set forth, in layman's terms, the USA Cycling, and all other releases ... were released from any and all liability for damages and injury that may arise out of a USA Cycling event, which would include specifically the Tour de 'Toona," the judge stated.

The Tour de 'Toona will not be held this year, partly because of the poor economy and the subsequent lack of sponsors.

Bilotto said the Scott lawsuit was also a factor.

"We look at this [the judge's decision] as a positive direction for the race," Bilotto said. "Hopefully, the sponsorships will return."

Sullivan's decision, however, is not the end of the lawsuit, Colkitt said. She said they will appeal to the Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court, the beginning of another step in the court process that could take a year or more.

Attorney Robert Behling of Pittsburgh, representing the race organizers, said he was pleased with the ruling and said he thought the lawsuit "had a chilling effect" on the municipalities and possibly some sponsors' involvement.

"This is certainly a ruling we worked to get," he said.

Sullivan, Behling and others expressed sympathy for what happened to Scott.

The judge called it a "most unfortunate and tragic accident," but he said he had to decide the case based on "applicable legal principles."

Mirror Staff Writer Phil Ray is at 946-7468.

 
Share:
Facebook  MySpace  Digg  Stumble    Mixx  Fark  del.icio.us   LiveSpaces
 
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-10 | Post a comment
DiverDown
07-01-09 8:32 AM
Whenever you leave the paved road surface - "the course" - literally every obstacle, ditch, tree, guardrail, car, etc. is a lethal risk if you hit it at race speed. Scott should have assumed when she elected to depart the course, she would hit something lethal. She made a very basic mistake in assuming she could just depart the road course without risk.

There are hundreds of similar ditches all along that course and throughout the week. The cyclists know not to ride into them (whether they see them or not).

The problem is Scott is not a professional racer - she was a Category 4 amateur who had just taken up cycling less than a year before this accident occurred...so she lacked basic bike handling skills. The pros do not consider Toona to be a dangerous race at all. In fact, they consider it to be safe.

Basically every race Scott entered would have been 'dangerous' to her given her level of bike handling.

This is not meant to be an insult, just telling it like it

DiverDown
07-01-09 8:23 AM
EmergencyServicesProvider - The plaintiff did not ask the judge to decide the case. They asked for a jury trial, but this ruling by the judge prevents it from getting there....for now....assuming an appellate court doesn't remand the case back for a jury trial.

EJM7591
06-26-09 2:00 PM
I'm sorry for Sarah and her injuries. If she wouldn't have signed that agreement, she wouldn't have been able to race. I think the race should be held liable, for making sure that the course was safe as possible. You can sue the state for getting involved in accident due to road conditions, why not the race to?

KlausVR
06-25-09 1:11 PM
First, God bless ya, Sarah ... with the medical advances of today, maybe something can be done in the future to help you. That said, I agree with Judge Sullivan. Cycling, especially high speed cycling, has inherent risks. There but for the grace of God ...

EmergencyServicesProvider
06-25-09 10:28 AM
In a civil lawsuit such as this the Plaintiff who has the burden of proof has the right to request a jury - obviously the counsel for the cyclist believed a judge could fairly rule on this matter. Much like everyone else who has posted you have signed releases meaning you understand the risks involved and you will hold harmless the parties involved because you are doing this of your own free will. I believe that the legal system worked in this case. I feel bad for her injuries, but you willingly accept risks.

42Employlaw1981
06-25-09 9:41 AM
I think this case will be reversed and remanded because the issue of whether or not the conduct of the Tour was "reckless conduct" is an issue of material fact for a jury to determine and not an issue of law for the judge to interpret.

You generally cannot waive your right to sue even in cases of "gross/reckless negligent conduct" because such agreements are against public policy.

Interesting case though! I certainly do feel bad for the Plaintiff.

orwell
06-25-09 8:21 AM
I certainly feel bad for the woman, but there are inherent risks in bike racing, and she acknowledged those risks. Passing on a curve is part of racing, but it's also extremely dangerous. I also fail to see how hay bales would have made much difference. Seems to me she would have just toppled over the bales into the ditch anyway. Good ruling by Sullivan.

ramfire42
06-25-09 7:25 AM
Absurd!!!! There are certain risks involved with everything. If you can’t live with the possible outcome of the risks you better stick to watching bike racing on TV. I can see it now… Millions of hay bails along Blair County roadways. Better yet, let’s call for bicycle safety reform (airbags, crash sensors, bubble wrap suits). I’m sorry you were injured, but I don’t think someone else forced you to take part in the potentially dangerous event.

brutis
06-25-09 7:15 AM
JOHN, I agree. I feel for the woman who sustained severe injuries. But as stated, she knew the risk. I would agree with her attorney pertaining to "reckless conduct," if indeed there was reckless conduct,". but it was a weak defense to state lack of hay bales, was the culprit. That's equivalent to saying lack of a traffic cop to direct a racer away from every minute hazard would of stopped this or any accident from occurring. I remember awhile back when a hockey puck struck a 13-year-old girl in 2002 killing her. A terrible yet well known occurrence at hockey games. And The total number of spectator deaths and injuries is unknown, but at least 29 spectators died and 70 were injured by race cars or flying car parts at U.S. auto racing events alone since 1999. Bottom line is c h i t happens.

JohnParker
06-25-09 4:21 AM
Can't stand the Tour, but you sign a release, you know there are risks.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
 
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Food Inspections  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Coupons  Mirror Moms  Things To Do