Mobile Version: mobile.altoonamirror.com
 
RSS:
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Mirror Moms  Things To Do


  • Scholastic Sports
  • Penn State
  • Sports Columns
  • Voice of the Fan
  • Contests
  • Project Reporting
  • Multimedia
  • AP News & Sports
  • Running/Wellness Challenge
  • Circulation Info
  • Real Estate
  • Advertising Info
  • Customer Service
  • Contact Us
  • Online Extras
  • Affiliated Sites

Judge denies a new trial for convicted child rapist

By Phil Ray, pray@altoonamirror.com

POSTED: June 5, 2008

HOLLIDAYSBURG — A Blair County judge has refused to grant a new trial to an Arizona man convicted in April of a child rape that occurred almost 10 years ago.

Last month, defense attorney Phillip O. Robertson asked Senior Judge Thomas G. Peoples to overturn the verdicts against Howard Scott Allison of Huachuca, who is awaiting sentencing on charges of child rape, statutory sexual assault and corruption of a minor.

Allison was convicted for assaulting a 6-year-old in 1998 while Allison was visiting his family home near Williamsburg.

During the trial, two of Allison’s younger sisters testified that he abused them more than 20 years ago when they were growing up. Their testimony was similar to that of the victim, who did not reveal the assault to authorities until she became a teenager.

Robertson asked for the new trial based on what he called ‘‘inappropriate’’ comments made by Assistant District Attorney Deanne Paul during her summation to the jury.

During the trial, Paul questioned Allison about sexual offender counseling he had when he was younger.

Robertson contended that Paul asked the jury during closing arguments why Allison sought counseling if he was not a sexual offender.

He charged that Paul’s comments were ‘‘so inflammatory and prejudicial and inappropriate that a mistrial should have been granted.’’

The jury asked a question of the judge concerning the sexual offender counseling during its deliberations, which Robertson said was further evidence that Paul’s comments were decisive in Allison’s conviction.

Peoples dismissed Robertson’s petition, concluding that Robertson ‘‘has failed to demonstrate any entitlement to extraordinary relief.’’

After Allison’s conviction, the judge raised his bond from $75,000 to $500,000 straight.

Robertson can appeal the conviction with the state Superior Court after Allison is sentenced.

Mirror Staff Writer Phil Ray is at 946-7468.
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-3 | Post a comment
donkeysrule
06-05-08 6:50 PM
Chuxs, I have.

marasmom28
06-05-08 11:20 AM
This is just an insane attempt to get him out of jail. He's been doing this for a long time by all acounts so he deserves to be in jail. I'm sure all his victims are glad he's behind bars.

Chuxspringer
06-05-08 8:00 AM
"Robertson asked for the new trial based on what he called ‘‘inappropriate’’ comments..."

HEY PHIL HOW ABOUT INAPPROPRIATE SEXUAL CONTACT. Are they comparable? Never saw anyone put in jail for comments.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Mirror Moms  Things To Do