Mobile Version: mobile.altoonamirror.com
 
RSS:
Member Login: Email: Password:
Search: Local News Classified EZToUseBigBook Web
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Coupons  Mirror Moms  Things To Do


  • Scholastic Sports
  • Penn State
  • Sports Columns
  • Voice of the Fan
  • Project Reporting
  • Multimedia
  • AP News & Sports
  • Running/Wellness Challenge
  • Circulation Info
  • Real Estate
  • Advertising Info
  • Customer Service
  • Contact Us
  • Online Extras
  • Affiliated Sites

Owner is cited for tree removal

By William Kibler, bkibler@altoonamirror.com
POSTED: February 4, 2008

Article Photos


Altoona officials are taking a property owner to task for violating the city’s street tree ordinance adopted in October.

Police are mailing a citation against Wilson Saguban of Union Avenue across from Tuckahoe Park for felling two curbside Norway maples without a permit.

“I made a mistake,” Saguban said from one of two corner grocery stores he runs in Altoona. “I apologize to the city.”

He faces a fine of $400 to $600 and an order to replant, Sgt. Frank Shields said.

Saguban hired a contractor to take down the trees because one was leaning dangerously toward his house after being hit by a vehicle and the other had a large rotten limb, said Saguban and his wife, Joy.

He didn’t realize curbside trees are public property, Saguban said, adding that he’s willing to replace the two that were taken down.

Had Saguban applied for the required permit, the Shade Tree Commission would have sent an expert to determine what he could do, Shields said.

A city-licensed arborist would have known the permit was required, Shields said.

Mayor Wayne Hippo said the ordinance is a blight-fighting tool. It applies to designated gateway corridors and prohibits cutting, pruning, spraying and planting of trees in the public right of way without a permit.

‘‘All of this is about improving the appearance of the city,’’ Hippo said. ‘‘Here is one of the prime entryways in one of the prime neighborhoods.’’

Homeowners who get a permit can do their own work according to accepted standards, but those who work on trees commercially need a license, Shields said.

‘‘I think it’s terrible [the homeowner] cut those trees down,’’ said City Manager Joe Weakland, adding that the mayor alerted authorities about it.

One stump is about 3 feet in diameter at its widest; the other, about 2¢ feet.

The Sagubans plan to argue their case before a magisterial district judge.

City Council proposed and adopted the ordinance mainly to protect the city investment, after hearing reports that at least one property owner had removed curbside trees the city had planted.

The Sagubans came to Altoona from out of the area but haven’t yet moved into the house, which they’re renovating, next-door neighbor Judy Rice said. The house sat empty since before last winter and has deteriorated, she said.

‘‘These are nice people who really want to do what’s best,’’ she said. ‘‘It bothers me how they’re being greeted.’’

The city isn’t trying to persecute anyone but simply wants compliance to prevent butchering of public trees, Shields said.

Mirror Staff Writer William Kibler is at 949-7038.
Member Comments
View Comments: | 1-14 | Post a comment
TheOneAndOnlySurge
02-11-08 11:59 AM
I think these individuals should start a petition to waive the fine and have the city reimburse them for the removal of the trees. Since they planted them and neglected to take of them. I also think the city should pay them a fine for not taking care of the trees in the first place.

Candlestyx08
02-09-08 10:12 AM
I'm all for protecting our heritage and keeping our city clean! But I remember a few years back when there was a bad snow and one of the trees the city planted along 8th street broke and went through a property owner's front window and he called the city about it. The city told him there was nothing they could do because they didn't want to pay for the window and told him it was his tree so he cut it down!!! There wasn't a shade tree commission then I don't think but since there is one now they should take care of the other problems I see in the city there are trees that hang in front of stop signs, there are trees that have rotten limbs,and trees that are about to bring down power lines!! what is being done about this??? If this happens to another property owner are they going to be told it's your tree and another tree is cut down,and who will pay for the damage??????

maxnit
02-05-08 1:16 AM
Who is Janet Blair?? The last family i know to reside at this house was the Vipond family and it was sold to the current owner

Schroeder
02-04-08 4:38 PM
Has anyone heard of Maple Avenue?? I'm speaking of the "Maple Avenue" in the Fairview district. I've not been home in fourteen years (although I used to come "home" every 4 - six years), Maple Avenue was lined in it's entirity with beautiful, georgeous Maple Trees and was one of the prettiest Avenues in Altoona. Friends and family have informed me the city cut down every one of them! What is the purpose of having a plant program and paying a spe******t if we are not utilizing them?? Can anyone answer this?

Anthony
02-04-08 3:35 PM
Altoona needs structure. That part of Union Avenue was always beautiful. The trees were definitely on the city right of way and Altoona is incorporated. I moved away from Altoona for a career move but I still visit once and awhile. Reading the good news coming from residents and Mayor Hippo's visions for Altoona gives the impression that Altoona could be making a turn finally into the right direction.

This property is not blighted. 90% of the homes on 6th/7th Avenues are blighted. Getting/using trash service and using a paintbrush goes a long way with moral.

Read up on the Broken Windows theory that Guiliani used for NYC. That type of implementation/vision that Hippo is doing for the city is what we needed.

If we cant take care of our own town, why would a company want to join us?

edrock
02-04-08 2:34 PM
It does matter who's home IT WAS.The city should explain that permits needed to do certain things in city limits.Slap his hands and welcome them to city by giving him 100,000 to fix the house.and remove the stumps.

BBUTTON923
02-04-08 2:04 PM
Altoona really pays a licensed arborist???? Wow there must be a lot of trees that need watched over. I agree with the person that said that the tree should have been tended to when it was hit by the car. If you cant cut them down because of the ordinace then the city should pay for the upkeep of the trees that are losing limbs, and slowly dying.

BrianSmith
02-04-08 12:17 PM
"The Shade Tree Commission"???!!! You have got to be kidding me!!!!!!!! Your government hard at work.

kathymcburn
02-04-08 9:27 AM
I lived within 2 blocks of that house for over 35 yrs. Hippo lived within 6 blocks of it as a child. The people always kept their properties in beautiful condition. As people age some things get left go as this house did. Janet's mother was elderly not able to take care of it. Hippo should be glad someone is preserving this stately home and not worry about the stupid trees.

kathymcburn
02-04-08 9:21 AM
It was my understanding that the new 7th st. bridge was the gateway to the city. How many gatways does Hippo want. If he wants the trees then why isn't the city checking out all the trees? They just wait till something like this happens so they can make an example of someone. Altoona always is looking for ways to make an easy buck off the innocent.

TheOneAndOnlySurge
02-04-08 9:12 AM
I think this is a joke. Not the law, but the fact he had a contractor do it. I think if anyone should recieve the fine it should be the contractor for not knowing the law. Regardless I think the tree should have been tended to as soon as the car accident occured. If the city is going to protect the trees then they need to care for them as well. This fine is nothing more than another way for them to make money and not to benefit the city but probable to pay for pay increases to the higher ups.

kathymcburn
02-04-08 8:52 AM
Hippo seems to forget that this was Janet Blairs home. Or didn't he realize she was a movie star?

kathymcburn
02-04-08 8:41 AM
If these people are from out of town and fixing up a blighted property I think the city should skip the fine. It seems the stupid tree are more important to them than the rotten house.

emilygottshall
02-04-08 8:14 AM
I'm glad to see the city authrorites being proactive about protecting these historic trees. Many of these trees were most likely planted during the 1930's or earlier. A 100 year old tree should be taken care of and not chopped down without a city-licensed arborist.

I'm glad to know this service is available and is there to protect our heritage.

You must first login before you can comment.
Existing Member Login
Not a Member?
Create a Member Account  
*Your email address:
*Password:
    Forgot Password?
  Remember my email address.
Local News  Obituaries  Business  Crime Center  Editorials  Sports  Life  Community  Mirror Takes - Video  State News  Special Sections  Mirror Locator  Real Estate-Visual Tours  Jobs  TV Listings  Movies & More  Blogs  Submit Your News  PA Outdoor Times  Coupons  Mirror Moms  Things To Do