Health care computers can kill you

Texting while driving is so dangerous that it’s outlawed.

But doctors and nurses are expected to care for patients while keeping their eyes glued to a computer screen, following prompts and clicking boxes.

Some electronic health record systems require 62 clicks just to order Tylenol, and a full emergency room shift involves 4,000 computer clicks. No wonder mistakes are rampant.

Last week, Food and Drug Administration Commissioner Scott Gottlieb pointed to “risk for patients” due to poorly designed electronic health record systems.

Children can face overdoses when medication orders are entered incorrectly; patients have had cancers that weren’t diagnosed because their scans were routed to the wrong file; and even one emergency room patient suffered a collapsed lung because medical staff struggled to access her health information.

Going digital was a good idea, but Washington hubris turned it into a costly mess. President-elect Barack Obama, the health care transformer, announced in 2009 that he’d make sure “all of America’s medical records are computerized” within five years.

Government force was employed to make the change happen with lightning speed. The Obama administration proposed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which slapped hefty financial penalties on doctors and hospitals that didn’t comply.

Doctors were forced to install systems fast, without a clue about which ones actually worked.

Medical organizations such as Docs 4 Patient Care Foundation warned that new technologies can have unexpected side effects and doctors and hospitals needed time to adapt to new systems.

Ten years later, here’s the wreckage. It comes with a warning not to allow radical health reformers, including today’s advocates for “Medicare For All,” to insist on sweeping overnight changes. Patients pay the price.

Incompatible Networks: Taxpayers spent at least $26 billion from 2009 to 2014 on electronic health record systems but got a patchwork of ones that don’t communicate.

Cookie-Cutter Care: Obama’s high-tech guru Dr. David Blumenthal wanted top-down control of the treatment decisions doctors make. Doctors have to follow computer prompts or be punished financially.

Stanford University School of Medicine researchers examined hospital records from six states, including New York and California, finding that hospitals complying with the electronic records mandate have similar, not better, patient outcomes.

Electronic programs evaluating when physicians should prescribe statin drugs are “highly prone to errors when measuring provider performance,” according to a research report by Emory Clinic.

Cardiologist Jeffrey Borer warns that atypical patients who don’t fit the protocol lose out.

Dangerous Errors: Getting rid of doctors’ illegible scrawls eliminates some medical mistakes but may lead to others. One-third of pediatric patient safety problems were linked to electronic medical records, according to Health Affairs.

Unhappy Patients: They yearn for eye contact with their doctor and are pestered with computer-generated questions unrelated to why they came in.

Fixing this mess isn’t like tossing a defective toaster and getting a new one. Some major health care organizations have spent more than $150 million apiece on these systems — and starting over is costly.

The lesson seems to be lost on Washington’s newest wave of health radicals. They want to abolish private insurers, eliminate employer-provided coverage and trust the federal government into providing better care for less with Medicare For All. Beware their hubris.

We’ve been hurt by it before.